File Name: robert cox social forces states and world orders .zip
We make these divisions, Cox wrote, in order to analyse the world and thus to produce practical knowledge of that world.
- IR Theory: Problem-Solving Theory Versus Critical Theory?
- History, Structure, and World Orders
- Approaches to World Order
IR Theory: Problem-Solving Theory Versus Critical Theory?
In this article we deal explicitly with the distinction as well as the dynamics between critical and problem-solving research. Based on a discussion of PhD work in sustainability studies, the overall aim is to stimulate critical problem-solving research for sustainability. In the past century, science was dominated by the view that its chief role was to study and solve problems and that these are the two means by which science, technology, education, and democratic societies progress Agre Typically, and as expressed by political scientist Robert Cox Cox a problem-solving approach takes the world as it is while critical research would question it in the quest for social change.
We agree that although this distinction is analytically useful it is less relevant in sustainability research where scholars seek to solve complex human-environmental problems in the transition toward sustainable societies. In striving to integrate social and natural dimensions of sustainability the dualism in focus here may constitute an incommensurability between different ways of pursuing research in the natural sciences as compared to the social sciences see Olsson and Jerneck Proceeding from a foundational article for an interdisciplinary research program LUCID, Lund University Centre of Excellence for integration of Social and Natural Dimensions of Sustainability on social and natural dimensions of sustainability Jerneck et al.
The sample is exhaustive in terms of including all the theses completed until the time of the analysis —; see Appendix 1. The objective of the analysis is to demonstrate that there are ways to overcome the potential dualism and fruitfully align or unite the two approaches in the service of incremental or radical transitions to sustainability.
In particular, we will show if and how these researchers seek to combine critical with problem solving research and, more specifically, how they combine the objective to identify and critically evaluate a contemporary unsustainable phenomenon with the objective of proposing pathways to constructively deal with that challenge and issues associated with it. The debated division between critical and problem-solving approaches is a methodological issue with a long history.
Among other things, science is a field of discussion and disputes where visions and worldviews are compared, defended, and contested. Clashes within and between scientific approaches, sometimes leading to paradigm shifts, are therefore both unavoidable and desirable. Although scientific controversies are as old as science itself it was mainly from the s that modern science and the way it operates started to become widely scrutinized.
For instance, Kuhn viii identified signs of what he called paradigmatic shifts or scientific revolutions:. Other scholars e. To exemplify, we refer to the critique against the grand narratives of social change and development that have dominated science since the Enlightenment such as Marxism , and to the rise of competing but more partial theories and narratives from the s such as modernization theory, structuralism, etc.
Besides the scale of the narrative, there is a dispute about the role of science in social life. Should science merely be an instrument serving specific needs defined by social actors?
Or should it be a means for experiment and reflection opening up for radical ways to understand social life? Should society be seen as one unit, as a whole, or is it better understood in fragments, in parts? Depending on their approach to these and other questions, contemporary scientists will, explicitly or implicitly, position themselves or be positioned in that scientific field of disputes.
In their effort to tackle the friction between critical and problem-solving research, the theses that we analyze in this study will offer new insights on how a new generation of researchers handle such questions.
Cox builds on a historical tradition from Braudel and Gramsci wherein scholars seek to understand the past and the present for the purpose of bringing about social change aimed at a new antihegemonic world order, preferably emerging from the bottom of civil society see Brincat According to Cox a theory always involves a perspective; it is always for someone and for some purpose.
Further, Cox argues that there is no such thing as a theory in itself divorced from a standpoint in space and time Cox In line with that, theory can serve two distinct objectives; it can be a problem-solving guide defined within the confines of a specific perspective, or be used to reflect upon the nature of that perspective itself.
The first objective is associated with a problem-solving approach while the second objective is associated with critical theory. Whereas problem solving is mainly associated with a consensus view of society, critical theory argues that social conflicts entail the potential for change and transformation Jones et al. As a special contribution to critical theory, and of importance for the focus here on transboundary human-environmental issues, Cox underlines that critical scholars need to take a multiscalar approach thus engaging with both global and local scales see Brincat The problem-solving approach tries to find solutions that do not disturb or disturb the least the prevailing socioeconomic order while critical theory is willing, if necessary, to question the prevailing order, often from a normative perspective.
In this sense, the problem-solving approach is ahistorical because it does not concern itself with the origins and nature of the conditions that created the present social order and its problems.
It is also apolitical, not seeing problems as political in need of political recognition, representation, and action. Methodologically, problem-solving research is concerned with verification. It seeks to fill data into gaps in given frameworks or identify a puzzle where each added piece will serve to improve efficiency or reduce uncertainty Gherardi and Turner In opposition, a critical theory approach always takes its starting point in the historical context that it attempts to both study and change.
As a further contrast, critical research is more associated with discovery, be it of new or hidden social relations or of new, unexpected, and less obvious aspects of a particular phenomenon thus often requiring a reinterpretation or reframing of social reality Gherardi and Turner In contrast, economic history, and economic sociology, would take a comprehensive, long-term, and often more conflict-oriented and critical approach to the social and political role of the economy or its parameters Granovetter Following upon its recognition of historical conditions and processes, critical research will often, if needed, deal with the problems at hand, such as the sustainability challenges that we face here, by considering how they interact with persistent social problems and thus also be open to fundamental social change Jerneck et al.
Scholars who are firmly grounded in the natural sciences may in an effort to study sustainability challenges tend to explain social and political processes using problem solving theories derived from the natural sciences, such as resilience theory, which is central in ecology Scheffer But as Olsson et al.
Some social scientists tend to portray the natural sciences as if they were operating exclusively under positivist paradigms that strive for scientific objectivity, reduced uncertainty, and scientific agreement see Moses and Knutsen Similarly, much social science research is positivist, postpositivist, problem solving, or critical, but obviously not always informed by critical theory see Moses and Knutsen Positivism as a scientific position goes back to Francis Bacon and August Comte maintaining that researchers can study the world in terms of its regularities and thus arrive at general rules.
Based on scientific methods, researchers detect, observe, and analyze empirical data and thereby reveal how nature and society operate e.
The most convenient interdisciplinary collaboration may therefore be between social and natural scientists who adhere to a problem-solving approach.
For example, actor-based models can attract collaborations between ecological modellers and mainstream economists because they both rely on basic assumptions of what drives behavior: economic choice, interests, and preferences in neoclassical economics, and selfish genes in evolutionary biology.
Although this may result in an interdisciplinary match, it does not necessarily engage with critical approaches and only exemplifies one way in which social and natural science models can work together.
It can also be argued that when social scientists label natural science research as problem-solving research they may actually misrepresent it. If one of the hallmarks of critical approaches is to recognize that knowledge is situated and thus variable, then categorically labelling the natural sciences as problem solving is doubtful. For example, depending on theory and the method of observation we would think that electro-magnetic radiation behaves as either a wave or a particle photon.
This underscores the role of the observer as a participant in bringing forth seemingly opposing aspects of reality.
Obviously, different interpretations of reality coexist also in the natural sciences to be called upon in different contexts depending on purpose or need. To briefly illustrate this, the application of classical Newtonian mechanics is vital for understanding orbital trajectories, while quantum mechanics explicitly invokes the role of observer agency for probing the fabric of matter.
A topic more relevant to sustainability would be human-environmental impacts of and social response to climate change, land use change, biodiversity loss, and water scarcity. Conventionally, predictive theories operate in a reductionist mode where their value is judged by clarity, simplicity, and fruitfulness Khagram et al.
In this so-called deep uncertainty, emphasis is placed on structured analyses of outputs across multiple outcomes. In situations and under conditions where agreement is impossible, these approaches capitalize on future indeterminacy in developing policy insights for societal adaptation. It can be argued that these approaches maintain a problem-solving ambition in that they either use models originally developed for predictive purposes or identify invariant outcomes across a range of scenarios to anchor policy decisions, or both.
Meanwhile, they represent valuable natural science knowledge. In contrast, domestication of perennial grain is a clear example of critical natural science research. The dominance of annual crops is the root cause of agricultural unsustainability causing huge losses of soil, nutrients, and carbon because of the need to replant every year Crews et al. An obvious problem solving approach would be to replace annual grains with perennials.
But domestication and breeding of perennial grain crops is a costly long-term project and for several reasons it is at odds with the interest of the seed industry. Conventional plant breeding has thus ignored this opportunity. Theoretically it has argued that perennial grasses cannot be domesticated because they do not allocate sufficient energy for the development of large seeds; and politically it has been less plausible because of a rapid shift from public to private plant breeding Price Nevertheless, a few visionary scholars started a still ongoing project to domesticate and breed perennial grains Cox et al.
Doing so, they did not take the world as it is but went against not only theoretical conventional wisdom and the logic of dominant trends in plant breeding but also the interest of the seed industry. In case of success their findings will imply a fundamental social-ecological change in and of agriculture. The engagement of scientific reasoning to the understanding of social life and its problems can be traced back to the 14th century e.
But for the purposes of this article the birth of modern sociology in the late 19th century is a good landmark for the analysis of science as a tool to solve social problems. The methodological approach used by Auguste Comte and early sociologists was very similar to that used in the natural sciences but did not go uncriticized. However, the dichotomies in these discussions went beyond the natural versus the social and included among others: empirical vs. By the end of the s, social research was increasingly employed by governments and businesses alike.
New types of social research methods were developed to deal with both new and old problems, but most of the above mentioned dichotomies still stay and probably will stay alive although shifting in importance.
The growing political pressure to gear research toward practical goals in order to meet national or industrial needs defined by governments see Hammersley , Featherman and Vinovskis will push other dichotomies to the fore, such as applied vs. The political turn created conditions for an expansion of more pragmatic and problem-centered social research. However, soon and as a reaction to this problem-solving direction in the social sciences, new critical approaches emerged.
Rooted in Marxism and inspired by socio-philosophical thinking, its mission is not only to understand the human condition in a social and historical context, but also to improve it, much like in development and sustainability science. Critical theory has both a narrow and a wider meaning in the social sciences.
Originally associated with philosophers and social theorists in the Western European tradition of the Frankfurt school Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Habermas , it broadened lately to include feminist theory, postdevelopment theory, race and postcolonial theory, and poststructural theories Kincheloe and McLaren Critical theory is concerned with how people are constrained by society. In doing so, it seeks to identify social forces that circumscribe or prevent freedom; expose how we are constrained by ideas, interests, or institutions; and inform political action through explanation and meaning making Denzin and Lincoln This could possibly also be the mission of problem-solving research.
Researchers who explicitly apply a critical approach must consider the social and historical context and the practical character of social knowledge, thereby taking into account the preresearch knowledge that citizens and social agents already possess see Bohman Following that perspective, the role of the researcher is neither to be an outside observer nor a full participant but to take a reflexive stance that allows criticism without claiming epistemic superiority Bohman To understand how values enter into and affect research requires reflexivity: how did we design and pursue research and what is our role and position in that process?
According to critical theory, facts cannot be separated from values and facts are therefore not value neutral May Also, the role of research is not first and foremost to discover or gather facts but to gain a profound understanding of society that can inform actions with a potential to change social reality Ragin and Amoroso The role of theory and interpretation in critical theory is here to both diagnose and inform change Wright , May Again, as partially observed by Cox  and as we ultimately claim, fruitful problem-solving social research is by nature critical.
We can start by combining a normative with an empirical perspective, and seek to realize forms of democracy where none exist Bohman or where democratic institutions are threatened, such as perhaps in illiberal democracy. In practice, we can try to combine a macro-sociological view of society and social processes with a microsociological study of agents and their activities and cognition Bohman such as done, for example, in field theory see Olsson and Jerneck in this Special Feature.
To refer back to our focus on sustainability we could diagnose agricultural modernization from a human-environmental perspective and then draw on Eric Olin Wright and his emancipatory social science to investigate the desirability, viability, and achievability of alternatives, such as agroecology Isgren Or we could diagnose the use of biofuels in the transport sector and evaluate its desirability, viability, and achievability in relation to other alternatives Harnesk To sum up so far, we see that the divide between problem-solving and critical research is not clear-cut because its relevance is determined by the aim and nature of research.
For those investigating broad issues such as the role of science in society, the distinction is almost always unavoidable, while for others dealing with, for instance, concrete issues such as the management of natural resources in a specific context, the distinction is rarely relevant.
The analysis of the theses, starting below, will relate, directly or indirectly, to these debates while also paying special attention to how the tension between the two research modes can be resolved. Departing from Cox Cox we developed a template to analyze and categorize the 19 doctoral theses in our sample.
History, Structure, and World Orders
In this article we deal explicitly with the distinction as well as the dynamics between critical and problem-solving research. Based on a discussion of PhD work in sustainability studies, the overall aim is to stimulate critical problem-solving research for sustainability. In the past century, science was dominated by the view that its chief role was to study and solve problems and that these are the two means by which science, technology, education, and democratic societies progress Agre Typically, and as expressed by political scientist Robert Cox Cox a problem-solving approach takes the world as it is while critical research would question it in the quest for social change. We agree that although this distinction is analytically useful it is less relevant in sustainability research where scholars seek to solve complex human-environmental problems in the transition toward sustainable societies.
Coronavirus Covid : Latest updates and information. Robert W. Cox with Timothy J. Sinclair Cambridge University Press, This book brings together for the first time his most important essays, grouped around the theme of world order. Contents Part I. Overviews: 1.
His work has opened up spaces for the critical reexamination of world order structures. It has reclaimed the realm of the social for a field that proclaimed the distinctiveness and inexorability of geopolitical calculations and machinations and showed how global structures reflect not simply the power of states, but the aspirations of contending social forces. To study world order along these lines would require a historical approach; it would also require scholars to recognize that theories of world order are themselves necessarily informed by divergent social purposes. Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF. Skip to main content.
Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 10, No. 2. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond. International Relations Theory. Robert W. Cox.
Approaches to World Order
Most users should sign in with their email address. If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. Don't already have an Oxford Academic account?
Robert W. It is common practice in academic disciplines to divide social reality into different spheres.
Main Article Content
This article studies the thoughts of Robert W. Cox regarding civilization. In s, Cox proposed about political conflict in Quebec based on Canadian civilization, including the issues on race, language, and religion. He proposed the concept of civilization after cold war because he disagreed with Samuel Huntington and Francis Fukuyama for putting an emphasis on political conflicts over structural economic and social relations. Arguably, the civilization conflict was formed since the Westphalian inter-state system and established by the Western nations. Thus, American Hegemony aiming to dominate of a one civilization in the 21 st Century is still clashed with Chinese civilization in Global Capitalism and Islamic civilization to counter the Western civilization.
Neo-Gramscianism applies a critical theory approach to the study of international relations IR and the global political economy GPE that explores the interface of ideas, institutions and material capabilities as they shape the specific contours of the state formation. The theory is heavily influenced by the writings of Antonio Gramsci. In this sense, the neo-Gramscian approach breaks the decades-old stalemate between the realist schools of thought and the liberal theories by historicizing the very theoretical foundations of the two streams as part of a particular world order and finding the interlocking relationship between agency and structure. The beginning of the neo-Gramscian perspective can be traced to York University professor emeritus Robert W. In his article, Cox demands a critical study of IR as opposed to the usual "problem-solving" theories, which do not interrogate the origin, nature and development of historical structures, but accept for example that states and the supposedly "anarchic" relationships between them as Kantian Dinge an sich.
Все это выглядит довольно странно. - Думаешь, надо вернуть им отчет. Она посмотрела на него недовольно.
Он снова говорил с этим американцем, и если все прошло, как было задумано, то Танкадо сейчас уже нет в живых, а ключ, который он носил с собой, изъят. В том, что он, Нуматака, в конце концов решил приобрести ключ Энсея Танкадо, крылась определенная ирония. Токуген Нуматака познакомился с Танкадо много лет. Молодой программист приходил когда-то в Нуматек, тогда он только что окончил колледж и искал работу, но Нуматака ему отказал. В том, что этот парень был блестящим программистом, сомнений не возникало, но другие обстоятельства тогда казались более важными.
Арест никак не вписывался в его планы. Росио подошла еще ближе и изучающе смотрела на. - Хорошо, - вздохнул он, всем своим видом признавая поражение. Его испанский тут же потерял нарочитый акцент. - Я не из севильской полиции.
Мидж Милкен явно чего-то не поняла. - Это многое объясняет, - настаивала. - Например, почему он провел там всю ночь. - Заражал вирусами свое любимое детище. - Нет, - сказала она раздраженно.
- Я думал, что вы в Южной Америке. Лиланд Фонтейн окинул своего помощника убийственным взглядом. - Я был. Но сейчас я. ГЛАВА 69 - Эй, мистер.